Skip to content

If you’re the one defending the number

You can’t defend a recommendation you can’t explain

Ten tools. Twelve tabs. Zero confidence. Duct-taped data behind every pick — and you're hoping nobody asks how you got the number.

GrowthFactor answers with the whole system: a platform that opens every score, and Labs — data scientists who build your forecasting model with you, on your own sales history.

See it score one of your sites
A black-box tool
Site Score63

That’s the whole answer.

1200 Pearl St

Boulder, CO 80302

GrowthFactor Score63Good
Market Potential45
Competition Analysis85
Area Vibe50
Demographics Fit45

Trade-zone median household income is $66,450 — under this brand's $75,000 threshold — and the population skews student-heavy, not its professional core.

Foot and Vehicle Traffic92

Same site. Same 63. One of them can answer “why?”

More than a score

A score is a feature. This is the system around it.

Put a site on the table and the questions start — from investors, partners, or the voice in your own head. GrowthFactor is one system built to answer them, with the math showing.

01 · The platform

“Why does this site score a 63?”

Everything in one place: plan markets, evaluate sites, forecast sales, and manage deals in one workflow. Your scoring criteria are set with you at onboarding — you approve every lens and weight, and can change them yourself.

  • Score any site in seconds, then open every lens
  • Foot traffic, demographics, trade areas, zoning — one map
  • A deal pipeline your whole team can see: Kanban, table, map
  • Full site report in ~10 seconds, ready to defend
Explore the platform

02 · GrowthFactor Labs

“What revenue will it actually do?”

Labs builds your revenue forecasting model with you, on your own sales history — every variable, weight, and analog documented.

  • Starts with an EDA on your stores — Discovery is $5,000, 30 days
  • Cannibalization, whitespace, and hypothesis testing on demand
  • Validated on markets you know before it forecasts ones you don’t
Fernando Montes, Senior Statistician at GrowthFactorBruno Kim, Data Scientist — Forecasting at GrowthFactorBruce Liu, Data Scientist — Modeling at GrowthFactor

Fernando Montes, Bruno Kim, and Bruce Liu build these models with customers every week. Meet your Labs team

How Labs works

03 · Agent Chat

“What if we opened two miles east?”

Type a question in plain English — “score these three sites,” “compare this corner to my best store” — and Agent Chat answers with the platform’s real data and models, not a chatbot’s guess.

  • Built into the platform — nothing to install
  • Score three sites from one prompt in 30 seconds
  • Already use ChatGPT or Claude? Connect them and ask there — the first MCP integration in commercial real estate
See the agent in action

Three surfaces, one system — the same data underneath, and the same rule everywhere: every number opens.

What sets GrowthFactor apart is they're not just handing us software — they're in the trenches with us every week. Our GrowthFactor team knows our brand, our markets, and our strategy. It's like adding a senior member to the real estate team without the headcount.
Books-A-Million logoDamian DoggettCFO, Books-A-Million
Books-A-Million storefront

14.1% higher sales per sq ft in new stores

and 25 hrs/analyst/week saved

Not for everyone

Built for teams that have to be right.

We’d rather name the line now than three demos from now.

This is for you if

  • You defend site picks — to investors, partners, or yourself
  • You’re stitching Placer, Esri, and spreadsheets by hand
  • Real money rides on every store you open

It’s not for you if

  • You’re fine waiting weeks for a consultant’s PDF
  • You won’t share sales data — no data, no defensible model
  • You’re not actually opening anything this year

Fair doubts

Skepticism is the right way to start.

Most teams we talk to have been burned by a tool that promised magic — we built GrowthFactor because we lived the same problems.

“I don’t trust AI with a multi-million-dollar decision.”

Good — don’t. A chatbot guessing at your market is exactly the thing to be afraid of. GrowthFactor’s score is computed from real data — foot traffic, demographics, competition — and every input is visible, so your team verifies the math instead of trusting it.

Skeptical of cell-phone foot traffic too? You should be. We name its failure modes — multi-story buildings, thin samples — instead of papering over them. The model has to survive your questions; your team owns the recommendation.

Every input traced to its source

“We have a process that works. I’m not retraining my team.”

You don’t have to walk away from anything. GrowthFactor sits alongside Placer, Buxton, Esri, or the model you built in-house — most customers start by running us in parallel and comparing answers on sites they already know.

It’s built to feel familiar, too. We built GrowthFactor alongside veteran analysts from national chains, so the maps, trade areas, and reports work the way your team already expects — not a new workflow to learn, the old one with fewer tabs.

And there’s no IT project on the other side of the contract: sign up, upload your sites, first report the same day. If we don’t earn a place in your workflow, you’ve lost a day, not a quarter.

Runs alongside what you already have

“Our data is special. No platform can model our business.”

We’re counting on it. Every Labs engagement starts with your data — sales history, loyalty, your own competitor list, whatever your business actually measures — and a data scientist builds the forecasting model with you, documented down to the variable.

Then it has to prove itself: the model forecasts stores you already operate before you trust it on ones you don’t. If it can’t explain your existing portfolio, you don’t have to believe it about the next market.

Discovery: $5,000, 30 days, your portfolio
We thought we understood what made a good site. GrowthFactor showed us our primary KPI was hiding the real story — and the variables we'd been ignoring were the ones that actually predicted revenue. Now every forecast is built on what drives our business, not assumptions we never tested.
VP of Real Estate, Multi-Location Veterinary Group

Head to Head

How GrowthFactor stacks up.

Placed by what each vendor’s own public materials show. Open the placement notes and check the math yourself.

Site-selection vendors positioned by score verifiability and data science partnership depthGrowthFactor sits alone in the upper-right quadrant: a data science team builds the model with you, and you can check every number yourself. Buxton, Kalibrate, and SiteWise sit mid-chart — their teams build the model for you and hand it off, and the customer takes the number on faith or via analyst walk-through. Placer.ai and SiteZeus are software-first with closed methodology.Software onlyA team builds the model with youTake it on faithCheck the math yourselfGrowthFactorPlacer.aiSiteZeusSiteWiseBuxtonKalibrate
Positioning based on publicly available product information, July 2026.
How we placed each vendor

Vertical: can you open the number in-app and check it yourself, without an analyst walking you through it? Horizontal: does a data science team build and tune the model with you, or hand it off?

  • GrowthFactor Every score opens in-app to its variables and weights, and Labs data scientists build your model with you on the same platform.
  • Placer.ai Platform and data feeds; its own docs position exports for your data scientists. No site score to open; panel methodology isn’t published.
  • SiteZeus Software-first. Accuracy is shown as an aggregate model score, and the AI chat describes forecasts in narrative — per-site variables and weights stay closed.
  • Buxton Consultants co-build custom models over a months-long setup, then run them for you. Outputs are shared; the model stays with their team, with no in-app formula to audit.
  • Kalibrate Software plus an in-house consulting arm. Its marketing claims transparent models, but no public materials show a per-factor breakdown in the product — analysts walk you through results.
  • SiteWise An in-house analytics team co-builds with milestone reviews and annual refreshes. Explainability is self-reported; we couldn’t find an independent review confirming it.
GrowthFactor
Placer
SiteZeus
Buxton
Kalibrate
SiteWise
See why a site scored what it did
Every score opens — five lenses, every input traced
Raw data via API; methodology undisclosed
AI summary describes the forecast; the math stays closed
Outputs shown; the model stays with their team
An analyst walks you through it
Explained during the build, not in-app
Custom model on your sales data
Labs builds it with you, validated on stores you know
No — bring your own data scientists
Automated per-brand models
Consultant-built for you, then handed off
Consulting engagement
Analyst-built, refreshed annually
Cannibalization + whitespace analysis
In-house team, on the same platform and data
Automated reports only
Automated tools; no services team
Consulting arm
Consulting arm
Boutique services team
Full site report
~10 seconds, ready to defend
Minutes on covered properties
“Under 60 seconds,” per their site
Instant to weeks (custom models)
Not published
Seconds, on their models
Deal pipeline
Built in — every deal, every stage
None
Listings in-app; no pipeline found
None
Site intake + pipeline view
Setup time
1 day
Days to weeks
Sales-led onboarding; not published
Months for custom models
Analyst-guided; not published
~2 weeks, per their FAQ

See why a site scored what it did

Every score opens — five lenses, every input traced
Placer: Raw data via API; methodology undisclosedSiteZeus: AI summary describes the forecast; the math stays closedBuxton: Outputs shown; the model stays with their teamKalibrate: An analyst walks you through itSiteWise: Explained during the build, not in-app

Custom model on your sales data

Labs builds it with you, validated on stores you know
Placer: No — bring your own data scientistsSiteZeus: Automated per-brand modelsBuxton: Consultant-built for you, then handed offKalibrate: Consulting engagementSiteWise: Analyst-built, refreshed annually

Cannibalization + whitespace analysis

In-house team, on the same platform and data
Placer: Automated reports onlySiteZeus: Automated tools; no services teamBuxton: Consulting armKalibrate: Consulting armSiteWise: Boutique services team

Full site report

~10 seconds, ready to defend
Placer: Minutes on covered propertiesSiteZeus: “Under 60 seconds,” per their siteBuxton: Instant to weeks (custom models)Kalibrate: Not publishedSiteWise: Seconds, on their models

Deal pipeline

Built in — every deal, every stage
Placer: NoneSiteZeus: Listings in-app; no pipeline foundBuxton: NoneKalibrate: SiteWise: Site intake + pipeline view

Setup time

1 day
Placer: Days to weeksSiteZeus: Sales-led onboarding; not publishedBuxton: Months for custom modelsKalibrate: Analyst-guided; not publishedSiteWise: ~2 weeks, per their FAQ

Based on publicly available product information and verified customer feedback, July 2026. Buxton became part of Audiense in July 2026. “—” means we couldn’t find it in the vendor’s public materials.

27

new stores opened in 2025

Up from 9 the year before—a 3X expansion rate.

Cavender’s Western Wear

700

sites evaluated in 72 hours

Scored with full revenue forecasts during a bankruptcy auction.

Books-A-Million

6 → 19

new stores opened, 2024 to 2025

Tripled the opening pace with the same real estate team, and the new stores sold 14.1% more per square foot.

Books-A-Million · Labs

Check Our Math

See how much of your week site selection is really consuming.

And how much you’d get back.

Sites evaluated per week35
1075
Analysts on your team1
110

Weekly Workflow

35 sites × 30 min cursory check17.5 hrs
7 pass → 1 hr deep dive each7.0 hrs
2 finalists → 2 hr write-up each4.0 hrs

The Assumptions

Every number this model uses, in the open. Two are yours to change.

Cursory check per site30 min
Sites that survive to a deep dive20%
Deep dive per site1 hr
Finalists that get a full write-up5.7%
Write-up per finalist2 hrs
The same workflow with GrowthFactor21.7% of the time
Fully-loaded analyst cost$150/hr
Traditional Workflow28.5 hrs
With GrowthFactor6.2 hrs

Hours Back Every Week

22.3

That's nearly 2.8 days of strategic work.

1,160

hours/year

$174K

annual value*

*Illustrative — computed from the assumptions on the left, including $150/hr fully-loaded analyst cost (base + benefits + overhead). Your workflow will differ; change the inputs until it looks like yours.

With GrowthFactor we've been able to expand much faster, make quicker decisions, we don't have to dig.

Mike Cavender

Co-Owner and Head of Real Estate, Cavender's Western Wear

Mike Cavender, Co-Owner and Head of Real Estate for Cavender’s Western Wear

Bring us a site you’re debating.

Schedule a Meeting

Or submit your information below and we'll be in touch to schedule.

Request a Demo

We’ll score it live — every lens open, every input traced — and you can check the math against a site you already know.

By requesting a demo, you agree to our Privacy Policy.